I'm hoping this is an all right place to put this topic, it's not an issue with the software or anything, exactly, more just trying to clear up some confusion.
I've just gotten into Yiffalicious and tried my hand at making a couple animations. One animation I published the other day was up for about a day and a half before being removed. I know there's a checkbox you need to click when publishing that says "Undesired interactions will be removed". I must have violated some kind of guideline or rule, but I can't for the life of me think about what it could be, and I haven't been able to find any kind of community rules or anything that'll help me out.
So the actual question I have is what constitutes an "Undesired interaction", and is there somewhere I can look over the rules and I've just failed to see it? The actual interaction I uploaded was fairly tame stuff, all automatically generated tags, so unless I failed to tag it correctly for what was going on or something, I can't think that it would have broken any rules.
Comments
Interactions are not removed, but if the score goes below a certain threshold after a certain number of votes then it won't show up under "hot" category.
You can track your uploads by clicking the "My uploads" tab.
I might just have to chalk this up to some kind of odd glitch, if it wasn't removed by some kind of moderator or something.
For now, I guess I'll just re-publish it and see if it stays up. Thanks for the reply.
Now when you mention it, I do remember there was this other user that had uploaded an interaction, but when he did it was uploaded as another user's. He uploaded it again, and the second time it worked. However, he was worried that the 2nd upload would be seen as plagiarism, and asked me to remove the first one.
This whole thing is quite worrying. I'm looking through the code and can't find anything that could cause this. The only explanation I can come up with is that the database is occasionally returning results incorrectly, which would be very serious.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I will have to redesign some parts of the cloud implementation.